I'm new around here, but I humbly suggest that if a PM4 design ever happens then the hardware design should be explicitly licensed as open too. This would help prevent the current situation where people are selling modified designs with no incentive to even provide a schematic. Thankfully the modifications in the current devices on the market don't seem too extreme. I base this on the fact that the PM3 Easy is the cheapest, so is likely the most stripped down. I'm imagining more extreme scenarios like:
(a) Someone changed the demodulation circuitry (e.g. peak detector) so that it was cheaper but had a degraded signal
(b) Someone found a way to improve the demodulation circuitry but the signal shapes changed a bit as a result. (this is probably less likely given it would most likely increase manufacturing cost)
I'd want to know about either of those mods in my device in case future firmware updates caused it to stop working!
]]>I had a look at the source code and I can see what you meant about supporting partial iclass command set. Shouldn't be a problem for me.
]]>The firmware does not support full commandset for iclass, for any proxmark3 device. Post in relevant thread about loclass attack. sounds more like you are doing it wrong
]]>However I have seen ads on taobao selling the schematics but they are most likely stolen property.
]]>...not really, if you have the money sure..
or if you are good at soldering, you might upgrade the MCU yourself, I read it somewhere on this http://wiki.yobi.be/ site.
or if you are unhappy with the 3.0...
Also help me with the video> Proxmark3 - Windows XP Driver Install
Https://youtu.be/MfU3WcXNUbE?list=PLvftlns4iCmLwHOmefio9jfUhiHEvtMPS
To see the installation of the drivers.
The port-com to take by installation is the com8, according to see in software (GO) I asked for COM5 and change manual to COM5. Now is the port-com OK.
-----
Now I am, at the point that I can not read anything with proxmark, I guess I did NOT do the (update bootloader)
I ask the experts. You must do the bootloader obligatorily?
How can I tell if my version is (R655, R650 or r486)
Would this be the case of not being able to read with proxmark?
----
I am using for the readings the SW - (go) and Proxmark tool, both without it.
**Excuse my ignorance and my bad English. Sorry :-)
]]>