Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
After a few I think I killed two cards of type T5577, I think I have typed a bad id during tests of clones ... (I did not understand the mode stand alone), I tried to rewrite the block 0 with a new id, but I no longer communicate with these cards. Do you think I little throw the cards?
my last writing is :
lf t55xx write 0 03C294CB
Writing to block: 0 data : 0x03C294CB
Error occurred, device did not ACK write operation. (May be due to old firmware)
Offline
have you tried using lf t55 wipe ?
Offline
i have a sticker on the card with TYPE : T5577 FREQ : 125K
But when i have realise my first command : LF search u
i have this return :
proxmark3> lf search u
Reading 30000 bytes from device memory
Data fetched
Samples @ 8 bits/smpl, decimation 1:1
NOTE: some demods output possible binary
if it finds something that looks like a tag
False Positives ARE possible
Checking for known tags:
EM410x pattern found:
EM TAG ID : 000003E9E5
Unique TAG ID : 0000C097A7
Possible de-scramble patterns
HoneyWell IdentKey {
DEZ 8 : 00256485
DEZ 10 : 0000256485
DEZ 5.5 : 00003.59877
DEZ 3.5A : 000.59877
DEZ 3.5B : 000.59877
DEZ 3.5C : 003.59877
DEZ 14/IK2 : 00000000256485
DEZ 15/IK3 : 000000012621735
DEZ 20/ZK : 00000000120009071007
}
Other : 59877_003_00256485
Pattern Paxton : 1583077 [0x1827E5]
Pattern 1 : 703315 [0xABB53]
Pattern Sebury : 59877 3 256485 [0xE9E5 0x3 0x3E9E5]
Valid EM410x ID Found!
it's possible to receive a T5577 with a EM410X in memory ? or maybe stickers error ? what do you thing ?
Offline
the purpose of t55x7 cards is to simulate different LF cards. Its fully possible to emul a em410x. The clone commands is targeted to t55x7 cards. Don't write to block 0, if you don't know what you are doing. Block 0 is the configuration block, which decides how the t55x7 should simulate. Writing a bad configblock (bad values), you can brick it, like in perma-brick it.
I suggest you read up on this forum, and wiki for LF commands and datasheets.
Offline
i have a sticker on the card with TYPE : T5577 FREQ : 125K
But when i have realise my first command : LF search ui have this return :
proxmark3> lf search u
Reading 30000 bytes from device memory
Data fetched
Samples @ 8 bits/smpl, decimation 1:1
NOTE: some demods output possible binary
if it finds something that looks like a tag
False Positives ARE possible
Checking for known tags:
EM410x pattern found:
EM TAG ID : 000003E9E5
Unique TAG ID : 0000C097A7
Possible de-scramble patterns
HoneyWell IdentKey {
DEZ 8 : 00256485
DEZ 10 : 0000256485
DEZ 5.5 : 00003.59877
DEZ 3.5A : 000.59877
DEZ 3.5B : 000.59877
DEZ 3.5C : 003.59877
DEZ 14/IK2 : 00000000256485
DEZ 15/IK3 : 000000012621735
DEZ 20/ZK : 00000000120009071007
}
Other : 59877_003_00256485
Pattern Paxton : 1583077 [0x1827E5]
Pattern 1 : 703315 [0xABB53]
Pattern Sebury : 59877 3 256485 [0xE9E5 0x3 0x3E9E5]
Valid EM410x ID Found!it's possible to receive a T5577 with a EM410X in memory ? or maybe stickers error ? what do you thing ?
you probably brick your card. try using lf t55 wipe. if it doesn't work, then that tag is perma-brick.
Maybe you could tell us what you want to do with it so we could better help you ?
Offline
You first have to program the radio block back to a setting that will work for your programmer. Then you can have access to the data registers again. Sometimes particular programmers can't set this block (block 0) back to usable settings, which can make the card inoperable.
Offline
try to reset t55 card first with :
lf t55 wr b 0 d 00148040 p 00000000
then do your new block 0 configuration :
lf t55xx write 0 03C294CB
...
Let me know how that turns out !
Offline
That looks like a strange config block.
Offline
well am not sure how strange it is(03C294CB), but am sure it is the same config block in the previous post /viewtopic.php?id=4603
Offline
that link goes to a very old thread, but not posts about that configblock...
Offline
Pages: 1