Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
Hopefully this will help in improving the module - the Read Block command can be a little flaky, trying to read a block from a Tag-it HF-I Plus Inlay (Texas Instruments). Note that the block data is 09 5F 9D B2, below are outputs from attempts to read the block without and with debug mode on respectively:
[== Undefined ==]
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
09 5F 9D B2 ._..
[== Undefined ==]
proxmark3> #db# Iso15693 Debug is now on
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=04
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=10
#db# RECV
#db# . 00
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# RECV
#db# . 00
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=04
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=02
#db# RECV
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=04
#db# RECV
no answer
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=02
#db# RECV
#db# NoErr CrcFail!
#db# .._... 00 09 5f 9d b2 8c
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> hf 15 cmd read -2 u 1
#db# SEND
#db# . ..A 02 20 01 ce 41
#db# ran off end!
#db# error, uneven octet! (extra bits!) mask=02
#db# RECV
#db# NoErr CrcFail!
#db# .._..... 00 09 5f 9d b2 8c c0 00
#db# ........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
#db# ...... . 00 00 00 00 cc fc 20 00
#db# ........ 00 f4 ff ff 00 f4 ff ff
#db# ........ 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
CRC failed
proxmark3>
proxmark3> #db# W*..|= . 57 2a 10 00 7c 3d 20 00
proxmark3> #db# ........ 05 00 00 00 88 0a 00 00
proxmark3> #db# .. 0a 00
Offline
try the "hf 15 cmd sysinfo"? are you sure its a iso15693 tag?
and finally, how is your antenna output (hw tune) ?
Offline
Antenna is working normally (I always run a tune before doing any tests as it can be a bit flaky):
[== Undefined ==]
Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait...#db# DownloadFPGA(len: 42096)
....#db# DownloadFPGA(len: 42096)
# LF antenna: 0.00 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 0.00 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 0.41 V @ 169.01 kHz
# HF antenna: 13.90 V @ 13.56 MHz
# Your LF antenna is unusable.
The card reads fine on a Galaxy S6 using the NFC TagInfo app. Writing to the tag using the Proxmark worked when setting the OPTIONS flag, however the feedback was still that the card didn't respond but data may have been written anyway (writing was actually fairly reliable).
Tag info below:
[== Undefined ==]
<Tag rfTechnology="Type V (ISO/IEC 15693 / Vicinity)">
<GeneralInformation>
<Value name="uid" description="UID">e0070XXXX4049a1c</Value>
<Value name="rfTechnology" description="RF technology">Type V (ISO/IEC 15693 / Vicinity)</Value>
<Value name="tagType" description="Tag type">Tag-it HF-I Plus Inlay</Value>
<Value name="manufacturer" description="Manufacturer">Texas Instruments (France)</Value>
<Value name="afiString" description="Application family identifier (AFI)">all families and sub-families</Value>
<Value name="afi" description="AFI (numeric)">00</Value>
<Value name="dsfid" description="DSF Id">00</Value>
<Value name="responseFlags" description="Response flags">00</Value>
<Value name="icRef" description="IC reference">03</Value>
<Value name="targetTechClasses" description="Target technology classes (Android)">android.nfc.tech.NfcV,
android.nfc.tech.NdefFormatable</Value>
</GeneralInformation>
Offline
I don't know the status on the "hf 15" commands, there were issues (ref: https://github.com/Proxmark/proxmark3/issues/20) on github ealier.
Offline
Pages: 1