Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
I have a mifare classic 1k card were all sectors are empty with the default key FFFFFFFFFFFF except for the sector 2.
I have tried braking into it using the nested attack but the proxmark reports it as not being vulnerable to it.
I have tried the hardnested attack but it gets stuck looping forever getting only one nonce, as I receive only one nonce I guessed that it must have a static nonce, but staticnested reports that it has a normal nonce most of the time, however, sometimes the proxmark has been able to detect the following static nonces: 3e4aa74b
a374ba74.
I do not understand while sometimes the static nonce is detected and other ones no.
Offline
I have the same issue but none reply to you, so is useless I try to make a new thread.
The command hf 14a info report weak, but nested is not working
Last edited by jonor (2022-10-14 08:39:55)
Offline
try static nested?
Offline
yes no luck, nonce is static only in MifareAcquireEncryptedNonces
[usb] pm3 --> hf mf staticnested --1k --blk 0 -a -k FFFFFFFFFFFF
[!] ⚠️ Normal nonce detected, or failed read of card. Quitting...
[=] Try use `hf mf nested`
nested fails because Tag isn't vulnerable to Nested Attack (PRNG is not predictable).
Last edited by jonor (2022-10-14 18:01:25)
Offline
Hello, I've the same issue.. I've tried all the possible algorhytms (autopwn, nested, hardnested, darkside, ..) but with no luck.
In the card an "encrypted nonce" is detected but when I try to run staticnested, I receive the message "normal nonce detected".
But I'm using a Proxmark Easy3.. I don't know if with RDV4 I could get better results
Last edited by cyberone (2023-03-28 09:19:31)
Offline
try pulling latest source, there was a bug fix
Offline
Hi iceman, I'm already using v4.16191.. I see it's the latest on github.
Is there another source?
Thanks
Offline
Hi Cyberone, https://proxmarkbuilds.org/
Offline
latest source is not latest release.
Offline
Re, so much for me
Offline
Ok thanks you all
Offline
Pages: 1