Proxmark3 community

Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.

Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.


"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord

Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.

#1 2016-10-03 08:12:14

rookieatall
Contributor
Registered: 2016-07-31
Posts: 25

hardnested problems

To try the hardnested fuction, I use a FUID card and write it with some different passwords which I record. Then I run the function.
pm3 --> hf mf hardnested 0 A 8829DA9DAF76 1 A
--target block no:  1, target key type:A, known target key: 0x000000000000 (not set), file action: none, Slow: No, Tests: 0           
Allocating memory for partial statelists...
Generating partial statelists...
Generating bitflip statelist...
Acquiring nonces...

it just stops at acquiring nonces and after waiting for a long time, still nothing appear. Is there some problem with the card?

Offline

#2 2016-10-03 08:27:01

gator96100
Contributor
From: Austria
Registered: 2016-03-25
Posts: 177

Re: hardnested problems

The hardnested command takes block numbers as input. Your taget block is in the same sector, so it's the same key.

Offline

#3 2016-10-03 09:13:01

rookieatall
Contributor
Registered: 2016-07-31
Posts: 25

Re: hardnested problems

gator96100 wrote:

The hardnested command takes block numbers as input. Your taget block is in the same sector, so it's the same key.

No it is different sector

Offline

#4 2016-10-03 09:18:16

iceman
Administrator
Registered: 2013-04-25
Posts: 9,507
Website

Re: hardnested problems

really no. @gator96100 is correct.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB